![]() If Manchios was the murderer and planted the letter on Verner it would make no sense why Manchios would then tell Sherlock that the letter couldn't be to Verner from Fabio.įurther the case is called "sacrifical lamb" the sacrifice isn't Fabio, it's clearly the game giving you 3 wrong options and having you pick one. (1) Manchios sure seemed to be completely unaware of the letter (2) when you ask if Verner and Fabio were a couple due to the letter he says this makes no sense and never heard of such a thing. Ergo whoever has the letter is the murderer, which was Verner as he changed into the clothes that contained the letter. ![]() It seems pretty clear Fabio wrote the letter to break up with Manchios and placed it in the clothes Manchios was going to wear for the ceremony so he would find it later. Santos and Matista weren't wearing robes so it would make no sense they would have bloody robes, they also would not need to for some reason disguise themselves in robes to murder Fabio. The Only solution that makes any sense is Verner being the murderer. After leaving,he didn't lock the crime scen because his alibi was that he saw the victim and ran to the police station,so verner entered and took the letter "because he was high"probably to show it to Sherlock,and then called Kurt to see the crimescene. Then he planted the letter near the body as evidence,whased the blood and put on some robes to walk out the room and pass through the guests before leaving to report to the police(the time he took to go on and bring back the police needs to be more than one hour to match Verner's timeline,which is also a weak spot on my theory). He made it look like a sacrifice he knew (he could have read the woman's book when it was still in the library or he spotted her reading this i admitt is the weak spot of my theory). Took Fabios' robe and put it in the wardrobe. Afterwards he dragged the body to the altar and sttabed the man after undressing him. So,I thought that majordomo ended up killing fabio when serving whine and he spotted the letter,so he hit him with the still closed bottle and runned to lock the door. This case only gives achievment for killing Kurt ,and the achievment reads "get justice for Fabio" which implies this onewas the murderer.īut,I think the burtler is a more plausible culprit.ġst-there was just one robe hidden in the crime scene and one missing,which should imply that the killer wasn't dressing one,and just wore it over his own clothes so he could walk away from the scene and blend into the guest crowdĢnd-what would the burtler do carrying the testimony with him?ģrd-when did kurt get the letter? It makes little sense that Fabio would write a letter to his sugar daddy if he knew they would meet and he could say those things directly instead of writing them
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |